Risk models from Canada’s largest bank shows a wider range of uncertainty for real estate. RBC’s latest models, shared with analysts this week, shows a general forecasted improvement. The downside hasn’t changed much, indicating a little more uncertainty. They also shared they are considering two new and “more severe” scenarios for energy and real estate. These downsides reflect the potential for a double-dip recession.
Macroeconomic Scenario Assumptions
Feel free to skip this if you’re familiar with IFRS 9 macroeconomic assumptions. For the rest of you folks, it’s a reporting standard used by most of the world’s banks at this time. One part of it requires assessing risk using unbiased, and possible outcomes. Typically you’ll see reports divided into three areas – base, best, and worst case scenarios.
The base, best, and worst case scenarios are exactly what they sound like. The base is what the organization will plan with, assuming things go along as they currently are. The best case scenario is if every banker’s wet dream comes true, and the economy is perfect. The worst case scenario is if every banker’s nightmare comes to reality, and it’s the worst realistic case. The organization needs to be ready for each of these scenarios.
The forecasts are used to prepare the organization for risk, so it’s important to be realistic. Too optimistic, and just a few hiccups can result in serious damage. Too negative, and they’ll be putting aside way too much capital, slowing the growth of the company. These aren’t just random numbers, but they’re considered reasonable outcomes. That said, let’s look at these scenarios.
RBC’s Base Case Shows Real Estate Rising 5%
Canada’s largest bank is more positive about the base case than they were last quarter. The base case forecasts prices will rise 4.9% over the next 12 months, from January 31, 2021. Compound annual growth of 4.5% is forecasted for the following 2 to 5 years.
RBC’s Canadian Real Estate Risk Scenarios
RBC’s macroeconomic scenario assumptions for Canadian real estate prices under various risk scenarios. Source: RBC, CREA, Better Dwelling.This is a fairly big jump from the previous quarter. Last quarter, they were only forecasting an 0.6% increase over the next year. The market would see compound annual growth of 4.5% for the following 2 to 5 years. A more positive base case is typically a good thing. However, it may mean more uncertainty right now. We’ll circle back to this in a few seconds.
RBC’s Best Case Sees Real Estate Rising 8%
The best case scenario got small upwards movement, but it was still pretty big. The best case forecasts prices will rise 8% over the next 12 months. Compound annual growth of 11.1% follows for the next 2 to 5 years.
This quarter’s forecast is a big improvement short-term, but the same long-term. The previous quarter saw prices growing two points lower in the twelve month period. The following 2 to 5 years would see compound annual growth remain the same. Just so we’re clear on how optimistic this is, it would mean prices double every 7 years. That’s about as likely as getting a full-size downturn.
RBC Worst Case Sees Real Estate Falling Up To 30%
The worst case scenario for the next year remains the same, but the following years improve slightly. In the worst case, prices would fall 29.6% in this scenario over the next 12 months. Compound annual growth of 4.5% over the 2 to 5 years that follow. The 12-month downside remains the same, while the following 2 to 5 years are now higher.
Circling back to the two “severe” worst case scenarios, with energy and/or real estate. The indicators are still in the range, but these would imply a double dip recession. This is when one recession occurs right after another, after a failed recovery. In this scenario, they expect the economy to “deteriorate from Q1 2022 levels for up to two years, followed by a recovery for the remainder of the period.” That is, after the 2 years of down turn, things will bounce back, and recover by the fifth year.
The biggest takeaway isn’t the upside or downside, but the spread between the two. If looked at by itself, the increased forecasts for the base and best cases look like a huge positive. When you realize the downside is the same as the old forecast, you realize this isn’t necessarily a positive revision. Wider ranges of forecasts tend to mean a bigger degree of uncertainty as to where things are heading.
Like this post? Like us on facebook for the next one in your feed.
The BOC knows they screwed up royally, and are going to pretend they lost control of the narrative letting bond yields surge.
Who would think that it would be a good idea to flood the market with cheap money? These are the people running our society…..what the hell! I can’t believe anyone in these positions could not extrapolate what giving people cheap money would do. Obviously it’s going to create unsustainable price growth. And inflated prices to the point people will overpay, overbid and eventually get themselves in a situation they will wish they never created for themselves. Especially when they find out that 800k bungalow they just bought in the dirty shwa was just bought in November for 600k and jacked up 200k in 2 months…….young dumb suckers!
The banks have no risk, they sell their hot potatoes directly to BOC as mortgage backed securities
They own 35% of all Canadian mortgages now. Going to 50% this year.
Pretty soon all mortgages can be state owned. Hurrah!
This is a classic case of not reading the room. Bond Yield market only reached 40%..meaning a lukewarm reception at best. In another article, you guys also state that the bond yield is going to hurt the housing market… and then in another article a forecast between 5 and 8% to increase OR a 30% drop.
I think everyone has to stop speculating and look at price indexes… As an example, here on the east coast, oil and gas has gone from 1.16 to 1.22 within the span of a week. The price of crude jumped from stagnant 40s.. and stayed there for almost 2 years…now climbing to around 61. People are not changing their spending habits here – they still need to get to work.
There is a disconnect between EV and traditional oil and gas market and traditional avenues are still filling the void. Fact: there are next to no EV cars here. There are quite a few new energy initiatives with wind/solar/natural gas. I feel for Alberta, a really do – but that government missed the boat with renewables and can’t offload the fracked oil due to LOCATION.. they were better off putting budget money into wind and solar farms on the many tracts of flat land there and in the nearby Prairies. As for housing.. whether it goes up or down.. the saying goes “the house always wins.” Canadians are already deeply in debt, still making 1999 wages and expected to carry the debt load on a house they overpaid by approx. 30%. They have eroded any leverage. The banks are winning.. unless people wake up and realize the volatility of real estate and start hedging for this.