Comments on: How Canada’s Unemployment Adjustments Artificially Lowered The Rate https://betterdwelling.com/how-canadas-unemployment-adjustments-artificially-lowered-the-rate/ Canada’s Fastest Growing Real Estate News Source Sun, 13 Aug 2023 23:32:13 +0000 hourly 1 By: Aria https://betterdwelling.com/how-canadas-unemployment-adjustments-artificially-lowered-the-rate/#comment-91654 Sun, 13 Aug 2023 23:32:13 +0000 https://betterdwelling.com/?p=23771#comment-91654 “No one needs to even really look for a job…”! Certainly not true…

]]>
By: Robert Owen https://betterdwelling.com/how-canadas-unemployment-adjustments-artificially-lowered-the-rate/#comment-91651 Sun, 13 Aug 2023 18:14:08 +0000 https://betterdwelling.com/?p=23771#comment-91651 Economists will tell you that 5% unemployment is deemed full employment. That is because 3% of a population is unemployable due to disability, substance abuse and mental health issues while another 2% is temporally unemployed. Those people are between jobs, re-entering the workforce or have relocated. That is a 1940’s view.

Today the massive fentanyl epidemic, cheap cocaine and other drugs such as alcohol have likely driven up the number of unemployable people to over 5% and as many as a further 5% are likely functioning substance abusers. That means until we get unemployment numbers of 7%, we are at full employment. Statistics Canada seems a tad lax on trying to get data on the substance abuse and mental health issue but their last data reports when the Conservatives were in power showed a high number of people with either substance abuse or mental health issues or both. These people are more likely to have issues that can affect job performance. Of course we also have regional pockets of low and high unemployment as well.

As the owner of a licensed recruiting agency, I see a profound lack of candidates available today. That is why I have a strong business- because people with job experience or skilled trades are virtually impossible to find. I remember a time when an auto mechanic earned (in todays money) about $85,000 a year. Today I see over $50 per hour commonly and some earning $200,000 per year- a senior executive pay level. Perhaps the most challenging people to find are in that low income bracket of $42-50,000 level. Often the combination of trading on internet marketplaces, dog walking (just an example), a part time server job and either a handyman or nail design painting job can add up to a greater income that a single full time gig. Not having to commute, avoiding taxes, combined with a flexible work schedule learned during Covid shutdowns means there is little incentive at the wages companies have budgeted for to induce people back into “traditional” jobs.

Either way, we have a long way to go until unemployment becomes an issue. That is the same for a recession (especially if oil and gas export numbers remain strong).

]]>
By: Sam https://betterdwelling.com/how-canadas-unemployment-adjustments-artificially-lowered-the-rate/#comment-91633 Sat, 12 Aug 2023 18:35:58 +0000 https://betterdwelling.com/?p=23771#comment-91633 What about those whose wage had been frozen for the past few years? All the inflation talk but our wages are going up at 0.5% per year. Canada has been suppressing the inflation by Killing the middle class. Good luck with that.

]]>
By: Ray https://betterdwelling.com/how-canadas-unemployment-adjustments-artificially-lowered-the-rate/#comment-91631 Sat, 12 Aug 2023 17:07:25 +0000 https://betterdwelling.com/?p=23771#comment-91631 So the whole Canadian economy is based on lies.

]]>
By: Gordon https://betterdwelling.com/how-canadas-unemployment-adjustments-artificially-lowered-the-rate/#comment-91617 Sat, 12 Aug 2023 00:33:59 +0000 https://betterdwelling.com/?p=23771#comment-91617 No graphs, employment rate inching up start of downturn?

]]>
By: Trader Jim https://betterdwelling.com/how-canadas-unemployment-adjustments-artificially-lowered-the-rate/#comment-91603 Fri, 11 Aug 2023 19:04:11 +0000 https://betterdwelling.com/?p=23771#comment-91603 Good analysis. People tend to think of stats as facts, but they’re interpreted by the modeling. Unless you’re looking at raw data, you don’t know what you’re looking at.

In the case of unemployment, the raw data is sample data too, so it’s always been a guess in the best of times.

]]>